Every vertical has its own maths, its own policy traps and its own definition of a good result. Here is what running Google Ads for a eCommerce brand in this space actually involves.
Pet owners buy on emotion and repeat on habit. Consumables like food and treats behave like subscriptions; accessories behave like fashion. Those need different campaigns and different targets, and running them together muddles both.
What I report on: Repeat purchase rate and subscription retention.
Health claims on pet food and supplements carry policy risk similar to human supplements. Size and breed suitability drives returns on accessories. Subscription churn is often invisible without cohort reporting.
Same vertical, different costs and rules depending on the market you sell into.
Benchmarks in USD, plus what CCPA and CPRA in California, with a growing patchwork of state privacy laws in Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, Utah and Texas means for your tracking.
Benchmarks in GBP, plus what UK GDPR and the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations means for your tracking.
Benchmarks in AUD, plus what the Privacy Act 1988 and the Australian Privacy Principles means for your tracking.
Every market is listed on the Google Ads hub, or see how Meta Ads works for Pet brands.
No. They have completely different repeat cycles and economics, and combining them makes both harder to judge.
Yes. Pet supplement and food claims carry policy risk on both platforms, similar in kind to human supplements.
User-generated footage of real pets in real homes, consistently ahead of studio content in this category.
Breed and size specificity in the creative itself, so the buyer self-selects correctly before purchase.
Bring your numbers. I will tell you what I would change first, whether or not you end up working with me.
Book a free strategy call →